iSACA Cybersecurity Fundamentals Certification 2025 – 400 Free Practice Questions to Pass the Exam

The primary objective of the post-incident analysis phase of an Incident Response Plan (IRP) is to assess preparation and response effectiveness. This phase involves a thorough evaluation of the incident to understand what occurred, how it was handled, and what could be improved in future incidents. By analyzing the effectiveness of both the preparation—such as training, tools, and protocols—and the actual response—how well the team executed the incident response—organizations can identify strengths and weaknesses in their processes.

This assessment allows teams to make informed recommendations for changes or enhancements to the IRP, ensuring that similar incidents can be managed more efficiently and effectively in the future. The goal is not just to understand the specifics of the incident at hand, but to drive overall improvement in cybersecurity posture and incident management capabilities.

The other options focus on specific activities that may be part of the overall process but do not capture the primary objective of the post-incident analysis phase. For instance, gathering user feedback and conducting interviews can provide valuable insights but are secondary to the broader objective of evaluating the overall effectiveness of the response and preparation strategies. Filing reports to external authorities is typically a compliance requirement rather than a focus of internal analysis, and while it may follow an incident, it is not part of the